You make a very interesting point. Human understanding and logic can be very rationally explained. A judge can for example give a very though response of exactl

You make a very interesting point. Human understanding and logic can be very rationally explained. A judge can for example give a very though response of exactly why they made their verdict. I think that would be an excellent benchmark for AI. This seems rather impossible when your understanding of the world is connection of billions of messy and uncertain parameters. But perhaps this is the first step? Maybe we can take the neural nets trained by Ml and create constructions on top of it.