3 ms·

As a US-educated entrepreneur based in Europe, I disagree. Their entrepreneurial culture is what's going to save the Americans, since they have the means to inn

by taylan 18y ago

As a US-educated entrepreneur based in Europe, I disagree. Their entrepreneurial culture is what's going to save the Americans, since they have the means to innovate their way out of this meltdown; be it through web 2.0 or greentech. Generous welfare state that we have in Europe presumes presence of a stable economy generating enough surplus wealth to sustain it. If we get outcompeted, it'll be the first thing to go unfortunately. We need to figure out a way to combine best of both worlds.

axod 18y ago
The next big bubble = greentech.
- taylan 18y ago
  Bubbles are a great way to build infrastructure: http://www.slate.com/id/2165929/nav/tap1/ http://www.slate.com/id/2165929/nav/tap1/ Build a smart energy grid during boom, and it will spawn a great deal of innovation during bust.
donw 18y ago
I'm probably horribly naïve, and quite possibly stupid, but I think the solution is actually pretty simple. Welfare, and all other aid programs, should be available to absolutely anyone, regardless of income. But none of these aid programs should result in the aid-ee receiving any form of currency. For example, welfare should provide spartan clothing, housing, nutritious food, and that's it. No food stamps, no cash disbursal, but a safe and humane environment that can help people to get back on their feet. For those who don't want to get up and work, that's fine too, but comforts like being able to get coffee at Starbucks, or a big-screen TV, or a nice bottle of wine, aren't going to be provided by the government. If you want luxury, work for it.
- barrkel 18y ago
  It should include sufficient resources to raise children effectively. Underinvestment in poor children, especially at a very young age, is probably the biggest opportunity cost in almost all countries in the world.
- gaius 18y ago
  If you do the maths using the UK government's own figures, it's actually cheaper to scrap the entire welfare system and just give every man, woman and child in the UK #3000/year, no questions asked, no strings attached. A family of 4, outside London, could live reasonably on 12k (untaxed, remember) a year, and anything you earned above that would be counted as regular income and taxed accordingly.
  - sielskr 18y ago
    In the U.S., Charles Murray has been advocating a similar policy. He wrote a book called In Our Hands on it.
  - guruz 18y ago
    There has been a discussion about this in Germany, too. One of the most prominent supporters of it is the boss of Germanys biggest drugstore/pharmacy chain. You'd normally expect such things to come from "leftists". http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedingungsloses_Grundeinkommen http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedingungsloses_Grundeinkommen (there are translations) Personal opinion: I like it.

by taylan 18y ago

axod 18y ago

The next big bubble = greentech.

taylan 18y ago
Bubbles are a great way to build infrastructure: http://www.slate.com/id/2165929/nav/tap1/ http://www.slate.com/id/2165929/nav/tap1/ Build a smart energy grid during boom, and it will spawn a great deal of innovation during bust.

donw 18y ago

I'm probably horribly naïve, and quite possibly stupid, but I think the solution is actually pretty simple. Welfare, and all other aid programs, should be available to absolutely anyone, regardless of income. But none of these aid programs should result in the aid-ee receiving any form of currency. For example, welfare should provide spartan clothing, housing, nutritious food, and that's it. No food stamps, no cash disbursal, but a safe and humane environment that can help people to get back on their feet. For those who don't want to get up and work, that's fine too, but comforts like being able to get coffee at Starbucks, or a big-screen TV, or a nice bottle of wine, aren't going to be provided by the government. If you want luxury, work for it.

barrkel 18y ago
It should include sufficient resources to raise children effectively. Underinvestment in poor children, especially at a very young age, is probably the biggest opportunity cost in almost all countries in the world.
gaius 18y ago
If you do the maths using the UK government's own figures, it's actually cheaper to scrap the entire welfare system and just give every man, woman and child in the UK #3000/year, no questions asked, no strings attached. A family of 4, outside London, could live reasonably on 12k (untaxed, remember) a year, and anything you earned above that would be counted as regular income and taxed accordingly.
- sielskr 18y ago
  In the U.S., Charles Murray has been advocating a similar policy. He wrote a book called In Our Hands on it.
- guruz 18y ago
  There has been a discussion about this in Germany, too. One of the most prominent supporters of it is the boss of Germanys biggest drugstore/pharmacy chain. You'd normally expect such things to come from "leftists". http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedingungsloses_Grundeinkommen http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedingungsloses_Grundeinkommen (there are translations) Personal opinion: I like it.