Perhaps you'd prefer the South China Morning Post, which had 0 mentions of this incident in its article[0], although to be fair that paper is owned by the Aliba

Perhaps you'd prefer the South China Morning Post, which had 0 mentions of this incident in its article[0], although to be fair that paper is owned by the Alibaba group, whose CEO magically disappeared for months one time for speaking out against Xi. It's a good thing we have numerous other sources on the matter[1][2][3]. But I suppose they're all owned by western corporations, so who can we trust? I myself wouldn't trust the paper that casually omitted a crucial detail about the controversy. [0]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tiktok-chief-tell-us-congress-093000314.html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tiktok-chief-tell-us-congress... [1]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/krishnamoorthi-gallagher-tiktok-bill-calls-children/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/krishnamoorthi-gallagher-tiktok... [2]https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/07/tiktok-users-protest-congress-potential-ban https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/mar/07/tiktok-us... [3]https://www.axios.com/2024/03/07/tiktok-ban-congress-phone-calls https://www.axios.com/2024/03/07/tiktok-ban-congress-phone-c...