4 ms·
I also believe that (at least in some states), this assertion is inaccurate: > It’s true, a client can show me where they buried their dozen murder victims and
by FireBeyond 3y ago
I also believe that (at least in some states), this assertion is inaccurate:
> It’s true, a client can show me where they buried their dozen murder victims and I wouldn’t be allowed to tell a soul, even if an innocent person is sitting in prison for their crimes.
At least in Alabama (for no specific reason other than it was the first hit I found):
> RULE 3.3: CANDOR TOWARDS THE TRIBUNAL
> (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly:
> (2) fail to disclose a material fact to a tribunal when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client
Seems to me that knowing that your client is materially guilty and an innocent person has been convicted for their crimes is "assisting a criminal or fraudulent act" by your client.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- singleshot_ 3y agoYou will find that the previous act establishing criminal liability is not the criminal or fraudulent act with which the attorney is barred from assisting.
- FireBeyond 3y agoHmm, interesting. And I know it's definitely an area I don't know. Although I didn't see any in those Rules that restricted the scope to the current matter in which the attorney is providing counsel.