4 ms·
It peetty much looks like that; Boeing admitted there is no documentation to come by, it was not the only time the mistake happened and we have rather credible
by hef19898 3y ago
It peetty much looks like that; Boeing admitted there is no documentation to come by, it was not the only time the mistake happened and we have rather credible whistelblower. Add to that a DoJ investigation, and the above looks like a realistic scenario.
We will know once the FAA and NTSB did their investigation and audits, and published their reports.
Just to repeat: When you work in aerospace, you do not work on an aircraft without documenting your work and any deviations or non-conformities. Period. And even if you are forced and pressured by higher ups to do so, you do it properly. The fact that we have a whistleblower tells me rank and file are less than happy with the status quo so. Doesn't change the fact that someone made a serious mistake working on an aircraft. That alone is serious, even if it wouldn't have resulted in an incident.
- wolverine876 3y agoThanks, and thanks for your insider insights. > Boeing admitted there is no documentation to come by Doesn't that serve Boeing's interests, to bury any record of possible harmful events, and to also bury the record of that information passing through other hands at Boeing? In other words, should 'Boeing admitted' be taken at face value, as an admission of guilt, rather than a possible coverup of much worse and a way to throw the line workers under the wheels?
- hef19898 3y agoNo, the intentional absence of documentation is in itself a serious issue. It can even be assumed that tjis documentation, wpupd it exist, wouod proof wrong doing. It tje opposite of Boeing interest to hide stuff.