3 ms·
What happens in the case of Boeing where there’s evidence that the quality checks were not complied with? At least with MCAS, there seems to be evidence they di
by bumby 3y ago
What happens in the case of Boeing where there’s evidence that the quality checks were not complied with? At least with MCAS, there seems to be evidence they didn’t adhere to their own process requirements.
- doubloon 3y agothe OP was asking about the consultants and their liability. they are able to keep far away enough from operational details so it wont matter to them. much like a prsident, dictator, or mafia boss can have plausible deniability because the entire system is set up so that they set a general tone and strategy but can claim they dont know any details, even though a child could guess what the details would be.
- bumby 3y agoThey were stating that a consultant has vouched that the process has passed quality checks. If it hasn’t (and it seems Boeing had not appropriately set up their quality checks), your statement implies the consultant doesn’t gave any liability? Ie they aren’t responsible for checking the system they are paid to check?