4 ms·
You're right. I had a typo. "a main view area with graphics, text and where input can be received from the user." But notice how you can look at that and try
by trimethylpurine 3y ago
You're right. I had a typo.
"a main view area with graphics, text and where input can be received from the user."
But notice how you can look at that and try to reason through what I meant, realize it's not clear, and respond to that.
The above is reasoning.
"The capacity for logical, rational, and analytic thought; intelligence."
ChatGPT can't do that and I don't mean that it can't do it good yet. I mean it's literally not doing that. There is nothing to advance or to expect advancement in. The "AI" doesn't exist. LLMs are simply not AIs and they are not in the path to AI, although they likely will play a major role if a theory towards AI were to be conceived.
- FeepingCreature 3y agoIt can do it, it just isn't trained for it. This one is actually kind of depressing. It's genuinely that ... as far as I'm able to tell, this sort of reasoning just doesn't appear in the finetuning set that they feed it to make instruct models. The way we train these things is honestly terrible in so many ways. Anyway, that's why I think the current mode of "well, I'll give it one attempt by charging blindly ahead, ignoring any mistakes I made and then blindly claiming success" is purely temporary. In my experience, if you feed it a metric ton of explicit guidance you can occasionally get it into a mode where it reasons incrementally and actually notices when things are unclear. It is in there, it's just not foregrounded. They're trained not to ask questions, you see.
- trimethylpurine 3y agoIt's an interesting take. I don't see that it's in the technology. If you have a way to make this tech do that I'd say you're in a class of your own and you've got something no one else has. You should press it forward.