While it's true that the report doesn't specifically mention each reported UAP incident like Nimitz or Gimbal by name, the conclusions reached by the report do

While it's true that the report doesn't specifically mention each reported UAP incident like Nimitz or Gimbal by name, the conclusions reached by the report do imply that such incidents were studied and considered, and said conclusion is that they do not, in fact, defy current explanation: AARO assesses that the incidents of UAP sightings reported to USG organizations, the claims that some constitute extraterrestrial craft, and the claims that the USG has secured and is experimenting on alien technology, most likely are the result of a range of cultural, political, and technological factors. AARO bases this conclusion on the aggregate findings of all USG investigations to date, the misinterpretation of all reported named sensitive programs, the lack of empirical evidence to support the USG reverse-engineering narrative, and AARO’s assessment that the piece of metal alleged to be recovered from an alien spacecraft in the late 1940s is ordinary, of terrestrial origin, and possesses no exceptional qualities.