3 ms·
Your response neglects simple facts. You are missing that certain vocations are not as popular to women as they are to men. I doubt this is inherently an issue
by locococo 3y ago
Your response neglects simple facts.
You are missing that certain vocations are not as popular to women as they are to men.
I doubt this is inherently an issue with the education systems.
I think what corporate America has been focusing on heavily recently was DEI, which is fine, but it seems that has caused management to lose focus on other matters impacting quality.
I've seen this first hand where a high ranking VP announced his highest priority is diverse hiring, again this is fine, but it's a choice in priority setting that sends a clear message if tradeoffs need to be made down the chain.
I am not against DEI or blaming diverse hires for issues.
I think management in corporations sometimes does poorly identifying metrics that measure what success means to a company.
Is it a 50/50 mix of women and men or to uphold the highest quality standard.
- ben_w 3y ago> Your response neglects simple facts. You are missing that certain vocations are not as popular to women as they are to men. Would need to be a ~3.3σ difference to justify the claim for Boeing. That's not so much "neglecting simple facts" as it is "ignoring irrelevant ones". Boeing has 145,000 employees, the USA has 331.9 million people. You need to be better than this.
- locococo 3y agoBoeing does not exist in isolation. There are many other companies in the labor market. What I am referring to is a well understood dynamic. It's unclear to me what your counter point is here.