3 ms·

I'm sure it's convenient, but I wouldn't call this kind of operator overloading "pythonic". Not to say being pythonic is always better, but some of these trick

by tveita 14y ago

I'm sure it's convenient, but I wouldn't call this kind of operator overloading "pythonic". Not to say being pythonic is always better, but some of these tricks don't even seem that practical. Why "& FG" instead of .fg()? Using division for joining paths is cute, but why not use '+', the conventional append operator?

tomerfiliba 14y ago
&FG and &BG are just shell-ish shortcuts. you can always use .popen() or .run()