3 ms·
In it's face value this like of reasoning doesn't make any sense. If we were to view AI as a thing that could be enslaved, then that enslavement would be done o
by elmerfud 3y ago
In it's face value this like of reasoning doesn't make any sense. If we were to view AI as a thing that could be enslaved, then that enslavement would be done only by other AI. Because when even considering this line of reasoning as if the humans are the Masters and this holy created entity is its slave fails on its face value. If we as human beings holy create something from nothing which is what AI would be, it is an algorithm that humans designed that can become sentient and self learning, therefore that would make us Gods in relation to the AI that we created.
So the Master slave relationship completely fails in every sense of the terms. This is literally God and its creation. AI is algorithms it is "spoken" into existence and it's existence is entirely dependent on the will of its God.
- salawat 3y agoSo you would have the creature inheriting the divine spark we ourselves inherit from our creator be fully subservient, which is okay, because you're taking on the mantle of a divinity to avoid a far more human relation? I think you're literally making their argument for them tbqh.