4 ms·
I think you're assuming more about my policy preferences than I've let on. This conversation isn't likely to be productive as a result.
by eganist 3y ago
I think you're assuming more about my policy preferences than I've let on. This conversation isn't likely to be productive as a result.
- snapplebobapple 3y agoOk, what's your policy preferences? You sound like a social contract kind of guy, which I obviously don't agree with. I would be more of a Rawlsian for legal system fairness and coercion minimization for social service provision (basically attempting to provide services that provide enough network effect benefit to the tax payer that the only coercion of the tax payer is for free loading avoidance rather than coercing tax payers into paying for things that are actively bad for them or negative value at current cost of provision)