2 ms·
Nope it was a critique of how could a person, even a brilliant person, on their own, in their spare time, become the most knowledgeable entity on these very imp
by jbjbjbjb 3y ago
Nope it was a critique of how could a person, even a brilliant person, on their own, in their spare time, become the most knowledgeable entity on these very important matters. Matters that have wall to wall coverage on the news, not just in the US but globally. Where there are all types of researcher, lawyers, politicians, think tanks, journalists, academics, and working in organised teams. So many many qualified and organised eyes are on this. The article even says the lawmakers don’t know what powers they have! I kinda think these are things they should know.
For what it’s worth, I think he might be a brilliant mind, but I also think it’s easy to look brilliant if you learn a bit about an arcane area. My main point was have we made a very important part of democracy arcane when it really shouldn’t be.