Like I said, I have no issue with people using "folks" as a sub-in for "people", and I wasn't trying to implicate you at all in the rest of my comment. I was ju

Like I said, I have no issue with people using "folks" as a sub-in for "people", and I wasn't trying to implicate you at all in the rest of my comment. I was just responding to this comment from OP: > People while also all including tends to bring with it the identity war with it. I agree with you that I don't know anyone who has a problem with the word "people", but I do know several people (now including OP) who believe that some people do and make an effort to use "folks" to appease those (as far as I can tell fictional) people.