4 ms·
Can you expand on this? This bill seems to enable exactly what the author is attacking: exploiting the desperate hopes of terminally ill patients to sell ineffe
by peeters 3y ago
Can you expand on this? This bill seems to enable exactly what the author is attacking: exploiting the desperate hopes of terminally ill patients to sell ineffective drugs.
I agree with removing red tape and allowing accelerated trials when the drugs are for these purposes, but it seems like today, drug companies can make a profit off of selling snake oil. They already stand to benefit from the reduced regulations, so why allow them to sell the drug at all under these circumstances? If they're so confident in the efficacy, they should be willing to give the drug away for free to benefit from an accelerated path to approval.
This bill seems to allow drug companies to continue to sell under these regulations, and in fact goes even further by removing most liability from them.
- yieldcrv 3y ago> but it seems like today, drug companies can make a profit off of selling snake oil anybody can sell sugar pills or any 'generally approved as safe' consumptive good, repackaged as something big pharma is hiding from you
- ProjectArcturis 3y agoYou can't make specific claims like "cures Alzheimer's" without a clinical trial. You have to use weasel words like "boosts immunity".
- thenerdhead 3y agoYou don’t seem to understand the bill and perhaps people are downvoting because they don’t understand either. I recommend you read it yourself and understand what it is saying. Not to make broad assumptions that “snake oil” will be allowed. Here is a summary I wrote about this bill based on a condition I have that can benefit from it: https://www.lctreatments.com/legislation https://www.lctreatments.com/legislation
- andrewflnr 3y agoIf it's a "trial", the patients shouldn't be paying for it, the drug company should. Is that not what's in the bill?
- tim333 3y agoYou could compromise by allowing a doctor to sign off if they feel the expected benefits outway the costs. That would put up a barrier for useless treatments but leave the door open for people to try stuff without 10 years of beaucracy.