Very interesting; thanks for the references. I'm no tactical radio expert, and can't quite remember, but I think the radio I'm referring to must have been the E

Very interesting; thanks for the references. I'm no tactical radio expert, and can't quite remember, but I think the radio I'm referring to must have been the EZ-PRR[1], as that's the only similar-looking one that is reportedly in use by the British Army. > compromised comms are almost certainly better than no comms. Is this true when undercover though? As a layman, I would assume it is better for each soldier to attempt to find each other at first (like any other human beings, they'd have their 'Schelling points'), and failing that, attempt to get home safely on their own. The alternative - arranging a rendezvous over a potentially compromised comms method - could get them all killed or captured together. Is there a flaw in my reasoning? [1]: https://www.cryptomuseum.com/radio/selex/ezprr/index.htm https://www.cryptomuseum.com/radio/selex/ezprr/index.htm