3 ms·

I'm very new to BSD in general, but I find it very fun and interesting! However, I need pointers to get started. > You won't be spoon-fed, and are expected to

by csdvrx 3y ago

I'm very new to BSD in general, but I find it very fun and interesting! However, I need pointers to get started. > You won't be spoon-fed, and are expected to have read the manuals and other documentations... I read a lot of FreeBSD and NetBSD documentation to get to the point of compiling my own kernels, but I don't think I ever read about the equivalent concept of Linux cpio/initramfs for BSD. My minimal images use a UFS filesystem. Here, after checking https://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ https://mfsbsd.vx.sk/ and https://github.com/mmatuska/mfsbsd/blob/master/scripts/mdinit https://github.com/mmatuska/mfsbsd/blob/master/scripts/mdini... I think mfsbsd is just a using tmpfs so it may not exactly the same thing as initramfs, that allows booting linux from a bzImage + initrd I'll keep searching, it's not super high priority at the moment, but it's something I'd like to do with (Free|Net)BSD.

LargoLasskhyfv 3y ago
If you're coming from Linux some terminology may be uncommon, different, or not even there, because equivalent mechanisms don't (or didn't) exist. So there's a different oral history, which makes it harder to get instant search results, besides 'BSD is dying', which leads to less results in general, because it's simply less used. Back to topic, does it matter if it's using different mechanisms, if achieving the same result at the end of the day? Like running in RAM, and not necessarily having to be 'installed' on some medium, being very minimal, and optionally 'rebooting/remounting/pivoting' into something larger, which may also reside in RAM? That OS-108 may have been misleading, because it seams rather dead, but I thought it did something like that, eons ago, when I looked at it in emulation. https://github.com/OS108/OS108/tree/master/LiveImgScripts https://github.com/OS108/OS108/tree/master/LiveImgScripts Anyways, it's based on this https://github.com/tsutsui/netbsd-teokureliveimage https://github.com/tsutsui/netbsd-teokureliveimage , which isn't, most relevant would be mkimagebuilder.sh and mkliveimage.sh from there, I guess. If that doesn't get you further than your own minimal images, I've understood you wrong, and probably wasted your time.

by csdvrx 3y ago

LargoLasskhyfv 3y ago

If you're coming from Linux some terminology may be uncommon, different, or not even there, because equivalent mechanisms don't (or didn't) exist. So there's a different oral history, which makes it harder to get instant search results, besides 'BSD is dying', which leads to less results in general, because it's simply less used. Back to topic, does it matter if it's using different mechanisms, if achieving the same result at the end of the day? Like running in RAM, and not necessarily having to be 'installed' on some medium, being very minimal, and optionally 'rebooting/remounting/pivoting' into something larger, which may also reside in RAM? That OS-108 may have been misleading, because it seams rather dead, but I thought it did something like that, eons ago, when I looked at it in emulation. https://github.com/OS108/OS108/tree/master/LiveImgScripts https://github.com/OS108/OS108/tree/master/LiveImgScripts Anyways, it's based on this https://github.com/tsutsui/netbsd-teokureliveimage https://github.com/tsutsui/netbsd-teokureliveimage , which isn't, most relevant would be mkimagebuilder.sh and mkliveimage.sh from there, I guess. If that doesn't get you further than your own minimal images, I've understood you wrong, and probably wasted your time.