3 ms·

This is totally correct and in line with all guidelines, naming once charged.

• afandian 3y ago
  In this case there was a question of threats to the defendant’s safety.
  • vr46 3y ago
    Covered already in this instance, thoroughly: 'The judge said in his ruling that he had examined “raw underlying intelligence material” before deciding there was not a “real and immediate risk” to NX121 or his family if his identity was made public. Lucraft said the three-month delay in naming the officer would allow for “the imposition of any additional mitigating measures to be put in place.”' Source: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/30/met-officer-charged-with-of-chris-kaba-can-be-named-judge-rules https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/30/met-officer-...