3 ms·
Hm, ok. I don't think they did miss the severity though, at least by my reading of: > That means that this "feature" by Apple either adds more computation for
by OJFord 3y ago
Hm, ok. I don't think they did miss the severity though, at least by my reading of:
> That means that this "feature" by Apple either adds more computation for nothing, or breaks the verification model that is expected.
they're saying one of two things happens: you get the wrong result (more severe than amount of computation) or you (because the cert it does have is not in Apple's store either) get the correct result, but wasted cycles doing something that you didn't want it to do and risked getting the wrong result.
- hnlmorg 3y agoYou, not they. The “they” in this context is the author of curl. And Daniel is fully aware of the problems this change makes. Whereas you’re the one barking on about computational overhead.
- OJFord 3y agoNo, that's a quote from the top-level commenter (who wasn't me, as I said when I first commented), hence 'they', because they said that, not me.