4 ms·
He reviewed the current state of affairs for Fisker buyers, which is valuable to prospective buyers. What do you suggest Fisker should have paid him for? Change
by bantunes 3y ago
He reviewed the current state of affairs for Fisker buyers, which is valuable to prospective buyers. What do you suggest Fisker should have paid him for? Change the narrative?
- throwaway4good 3y agoNow it is probably too late - but yes - before the review - carefully manage, pamper, and pay.
- archerx 3y agoI disagree, I prefer when reviews are not bought and paid for. Whenever I find out a reviewer is doing paid reviews I know to disregard everything they say because objectivity is gone.
- throwaway4good 3y agoThat is the trick of tech influencers; they pretend they are not getting paid. But they are.
- thih9 3y agoWhy would they, if they can profit more from delivering a review that is not aligned with the manufacturer? Case in point.
- blitzar 3y agoThey get paid in access - you cant make a review if you dont have products to review. (and envelopes full of cash of course)
- thih9 3y agoNote that this submission is again a counter example. The manufacturer withheld the product and asked the reviewer to wait, the reviewer got access to the product themselves.