That's one way of reading it - although I find it's at odds with the heading "Idempotency in one line of code." If it's the case that the idempotency wrapper i

That's one way of reading it - although I find it's at odds with the heading "Idempotency in one line of code." If it's the case that the idempotency wrapper is only for operations that are already idempotent, it makes me wonder that the docs couldn't do a better job of communicating the purpose and function. Decorate your idempotent operations.. to make them more idempotent?