4 ms·
You are claiming that absurd conflicts within a political party mean it cannot be taken seriously, but the Democrats have the "blue dog" faction and a prominent
by m0llusk 3y ago
You are claiming that absurd conflicts within a political party mean it cannot be taken seriously, but the Democrats have the "blue dog" faction and a prominent representative who recently proposed a fifty dollar an hour minimum wage law and the Republicans stretch from Romney to the colorful current party leadership.
If you were really thinking about whether or not to take Libertarians seriously then you might take some lessons from the book The Righteous Mind that points out moral axes and notes that liberals tend to focus on care and harm, conservatives focus most on fairness and cheating, and libertarians with their focus on liberty are just behind both of those. It might also be interesting to consider the content of Libertarian meetings which are often dominated by discussion of cannabis legalization, right to repair, and arguments for a universal basic income.
- bastawhiz 3y agoSo many words to say "I think handicapped people should pay more for an Uber"
- m0llusk 3y agoYou misunderstood. I'm just trying to express the realities of Libertarian leaning politics. In this particular case I don't have a strong opinion and it isn't clear what options would most enhance the liberty of the general public. Uber has made an impact, but so far the business continues to lose vast amounts of money while disrupting similar options. How we might best structure this transportation sector seems to be an open question whether one is trying to optimize for liberty or efficiency or whatever else.