>It's trivially easy to figure out how to calculate a rough number. I'd go so far as to say blatantly obvious. It's also a waste of time to actually do it. Giv

>It's trivially easy to figure out how to calculate a rough number. I'd go so far as to say blatantly obvious. It's also a waste of time to actually do it. Given any X, only a small minority of the people who believe they have the skills needed to do X competently are right. Dunning–Kruger as usual. It should be trivially easy to figure out roughly how many golf balls fit in a double-decker bus. In fact, it shouldn't take more than a few minutes of figuring, so the time wasted ought to be minimal. If it does take longer than a few minutes, then the interviewer has learned something important about you, so it's not a waste of time then either.