3 ms·
If I've understood the Motorola page correctly, they do not give you the unlock code for your device if you do not agree to the terms. That would be considerati
by tzs 3y ago
If I've understood the Motorola page correctly, they do not give you the unlock code for your device if you do not agree to the terms. That would be consideration.
- ajross 3y agoWhich as mentioned would be a pretty novel argument. In all other circumstances in the industry, it's just an EULA you have to click through to download software. Those have repeatedly been found unenforceable any time someone tries to do something tricky or weird with one. Clicking away your right to sell your own property is awfully weird. Contracts that do complicated things involve negotiation and signatures, generally. The more you rely on caveat emptor and the assumption that the License Clicker read through all the fine print, the more likely you are to get your contract tossed. And of course there's a wikipedia page on this too, in parciular the "contracts of adhesion" paragraph under the US law section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_form_contract https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_form_contract
- ClumsyPilot 3y ago> That would be consideration. For device you already own? I don’t think so
- tzs 3y agoI don't see how that would be relevant to the question of whether or not there is consideration. They are giving you something valuable in exchange for a promise. That what makes it valuable to you is that you can use it with a device you already own does not change that. Contract law generally just cares that it is valuable, not the particulars of what makes it valuable.