I was going to respond the same thing but it’s really pointless. What would it even mean to say that one doesn’t have the right to free speech, if having the r

I was going to respond the same thing but it’s really pointless. What would it even mean to say that one doesn’t have the right to free speech, if having the right was indefensible after having spoken? “You have the right to bear arms but I have the right to persecute you for bearing arms”?? “You have the right to remain silent but I have the right to jail you for remaining silent”?? “Rights” in this case seem to be conflated with the technical capacity to exist as a human being and nothing beyond that. It’s just virtue signaling without substance.