5 ms·
What I can't figure out is how DoS-ing congress helps them achieve their goal. This was an "inorganic" campaign and based on misinformation. Seems like an exce
by xyzzy123 3y ago
What I can't figure out is how DoS-ing congress helps them achieve their goal. This was an "inorganic" campaign and based on misinformation.
Seems like an excellent demonstration of the risks of having your citizens wired up to foreign controlled algorithmic feeds.
- hooverd 3y agoOnly the finest domestic content slop for me, please.
- bsder 3y agoYeah, if you wanted to demonstrate that TikTok needs to be banned, you couldn't have done it better. Even beside the national security implications, the fact that TikTok just demonstrated enough influence that it might threaten Congressmen in elections ... ayup, that's gonna get the ban hammer tout suite from both sides.
- bluefishinit 3y agoWe live in a democracy. It's not the job of these government agents to ignore their constituents, it's their job to listen to them. This is demonstrating that TikTok should not be banned.
- bsder 3y agoCorrect. We live in a democracy. TikTok just demonstrated it is an existential threat to that democracy by conducting a DDoS directly against Congress at the behest of a very non-democratic Chinese government. TikTok should be shut down. Immediately.
- bluefishinit 3y agoTikTok did no such thing. Those people have free will, which in a democracy would be respected.
- figassis 3y agoWe all like to believe this, but practically it’s not always true. With enough resources you can make a significant part of the population act in your interests and against their own. Now I won’t get into the argument that each and every soul is able to reason and defend their interests at all times or whether if they did what you pushed them to do, it’s because your interests were in fact already aligned, there are countless examples to the contrary. So if you, as a foreign entity, can exert your will on a democracy this directly, yup, I’d ban you.
- bluefishinit 3y agoBut that would violate the free will of all of the people who have no problem with China owning the app that they use. There's endless propaganda and advertising we are subjected to in the west. Second guessing people's free will because of influence destroys democracy.
- figassis 3y agoor the free will to not use seat belts, to speed, to blast your loudspeakers to your neighbors, to walk around with a contagious disease because you're immune...in the end why do you live in a society where you rely on others if you should just be allowed to do every single thing you want to do regardless of how it affects said society? Perhaps the some situations need to be more carefully considered and agreed upon by the whole?
- bluefishinit 3y agoCensoring information is not in any way comparable to the items you list. It's also disingenuous to ignore the motivation behind this suggested ban. It came about from Zionists who are convinced that TikTok is the reason younger generations don't support Zionism. This only happened because of Oct 7th. It's a violation of the rights of US citizens.
- 3y ago
- krapp 3y agoAmerican algorithmic feeds full of COVID nonsense and election misinformation sent Americans out into the streets armed and willing to commit violence. Why is this a bridge too far?
- xyzzy123 3y agoI agree all the socials are full of memetic hazards and nonsense. Data plane issue. The platforms obviously bear major responsibility for this but to an extent their hands are tied by dispute about what constitutes "valid" speech. My perspective is that if this had been an "organic" protest it would have been fine. What TikTok demonstrated is that the platform is willing to directly spread misinformation to users through system messages with custom UX flows to magnify the impact. Devs at TikTok worked on this, they had meetings about it, they tracked progress until the work was done etc. That's a CONTROL PLANE issue.
- krapp 3y agoWhat does "organic" even mean in this context? Of course TikTok tried to get their userbase to protest Congress if Congress was trying to regulate them. That is entirely within their rights, and just about any American platform would have done the same, including distorting the message as much in their favor as possible. That's politics as it's meant to be played.
- xyzzy123 3y agoTo me, "organic" means people organising via messaging within the data plane of the platform, exercising their rights to free speech and political organisation. Can you name a prior instance where a social platform has added custom UX to "contact your congressman" or similar? (Bonus points if it is also about something actually untrue like "the service will be shut down").
- krapp 3y agoI don't know, I haven't been keeping track of the specific UI of every social platform to correlate design changes with instances of attempted political action. Why is it relevant?
- __derek__ 3y agoThat seems to be the committee's takeaway, too: > “The fact that they used geo-location targeting to go after minor children to call congressional offices with misinformation about the bill caused so many members on the E&C Committee to vote in favor," [Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi] said. [1]: https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-ban-bytedance-bill-divest-5b5a685e8f1e19d22182d62526bf19b8 https://apnews.com/article/tiktok-ban-bytedance-bill-divest-...