6 ms·

It's not their house. Someone bought an iPhone (not leased, bought, they own it now). Someone else made an app that that person wants to install on their iPhone

It's not their house. Someone bought an iPhone (not leased, bought, they own it now). Someone else made an app that that person wants to install on their iPhone (solely thanks to app developer's own marketing efforts). But Apple thinks it's appropriate to have their finger in the pie too.

catlikesshrimp 3y ago
Now there are fewer (or none) apple followers defending the old argument: Apple is entitled to profit for their platform. Thank EU for Striking some sense on that.
Aloisius 3y ago
Nobody bought the Apple SDKs or OS though and every app depends on them. I get people are use to free, but plenty of companies license software for royalties that does a lot less.
- grishka 3y ago
  > Nobody bought the Apple SDKs That's what the $99/year fee is for. Apple set that price themselves. It can also be argued that some of the cost of the SDKs is included into the price of the Mac that any iOS developer has to have. > or OS That's included into the price of every iPhone because you can't even buy an iPhone without an OS or install your own, like you can do with PCs.
its_ethan 3y ago
Does apple having designed, developed, and manufactured the phone as well as having built, maintained, and serviced the App store mean nothing? The App store is a highly trusted place to download things on your phone, and that's a value that apple provides and that costs money to maintain. Pretending that it's as isolated as you pretend feels very disingenuous.
- grishka 3y ago
  I'm an Android developer myself, but the app store is commonly seen by my iOS colleagues just as a stupid hurdle they must clear to get their app out to the world. Not as the godsend that Apple portrays it. If the app store is truly as immensely useful as Apple wants everyone to believe, why not enable full-on Android-style sideloading on iOS and let the app store compete with that on its own merits? Surely everyone would still prefer it if it's so great?

catlikesshrimp 3y ago

Now there are fewer (or none) apple followers defending the old argument: Apple is entitled to profit for their platform. Thank EU for Striking some sense on that.

Aloisius 3y ago

Nobody bought the Apple SDKs or OS though and every app depends on them. I get people are use to free, but plenty of companies license software for royalties that does a lot less.

grishka 3y ago
> Nobody bought the Apple SDKs That's what the $99/year fee is for. Apple set that price themselves. It can also be argued that some of the cost of the SDKs is included into the price of the Mac that any iOS developer has to have. > or OS That's included into the price of every iPhone because you can't even buy an iPhone without an OS or install your own, like you can do with PCs.

its_ethan 3y ago

Does apple having designed, developed, and manufactured the phone as well as having built, maintained, and serviced the App store mean nothing? The App store is a highly trusted place to download things on your phone, and that's a value that apple provides and that costs money to maintain. Pretending that it's as isolated as you pretend feels very disingenuous.

grishka 3y ago
I'm an Android developer myself, but the app store is commonly seen by my iOS colleagues just as a stupid hurdle they must clear to get their app out to the world. Not as the godsend that Apple portrays it. If the app store is truly as immensely useful as Apple wants everyone to believe, why not enable full-on Android-style sideloading on iOS and let the app store compete with that on its own merits? Surely everyone would still prefer it if it's so great?