> Statement like yours are not doing any service to Rust. Rust advocacy can do very much without such "help". Hopefully it does not represent culture of Rust co

> Statement like yours are not doing any service to Rust. Rust advocacy can do very much without such "help". Hopefully it does not represent culture of Rust community in general. Ugh. You’re disagreeing about which languages are best for some task. Are either one of you being-an-advocate? That’s up to interpretation. It’s not fair to say that someone who vouches for Rust is being-an-advocate while someone who vouches for C++ is just arguing normally. What basis is there for that? I could say that you are not doing any service to Rust-naysayers. That I hope that the culture of Rust-naysayers are not represented by people like you. Would that be fair?