4 ms·
Slaughtering a bunch of dancers at a festival seems congruent with terrorism to me. Your argument seems to be: it's okay to do terrorist things if someone make
by hellojesus 3y ago
Slaughtering a bunch of dancers at a festival seems congruent with terrorism to me.
Your argument seems to be: it's okay to do terrorist things if someone makes you. But that's still terrorism.
- Qem 3y ago> Slaughtering a bunch of dancers at a festival seems congruent with terrorism to me. There's evidence many of them were killed by friendly fire, to avoid capture and the need for hostage swaps. See: https://thecradle.co/articles-id/18526 https://thecradle.co/articles-id/18526 https://www.oct7factcheck.com/oct7factcheck/Friendly-fire-Israelis-killed-by-IDF-a0b3530b556e423bb8b40f3b2a5e39bc https://www.oct7factcheck.com/oct7factcheck/Friendly-fire-Is... https://w.ynet.co.il/yediot/7-days/time-of-darkness https://w.ynet.co.il/yediot/7-days/time-of-darkness
- hellojesus 3y agoI recall seeing this shortly after Oct 7; though at that time it was difficult to distinguish whether it was propaganda. I think the Hannibal Directive is not great, but at the same time the Israelis wouldn't have committed those acts had the terrorists not crossed into Isreal intending to do terrorist things. It's terrorism whether you invade to kidnapp civilians or to murder them, and they're was plenty of civilian murdering happening that day as well. Even if Isreal goaded them into doing it to justify genocide, it's still Hamas who decided to do the terrorism.