3 ms·

tl;dr (conclusion, no evidence of aliens or conspiracy) To date, AARO has not discovered any empirical evidence that any sighting of a UAP represented

by krapp 3y ago

tl;dr (conclusion, no evidence of aliens or conspiracy) To date, AARO has not discovered any empirical evidence that any sighting of a UAP represented off-world technology or the existence a classified program that had not been properly reported to Congress. Investigative efforts determined that most sightings were the result of misidentification of ordinary objects and phenomena. Although many UAP reports remain unsolved, AARO assesses that if additional, quality data were available, most of these cases also could be identified and resolved as ordinary objects or phenomena. Also, referring to AATIP, Lue Elizondo and Skinwalker Ranch[0,1]: AARO researched and interviewed numerous people, programs, and leads. It has determined that modern allegations that the USG is hiding off-world technology and beings largely originate from the same group of individuals who have ties to the cancelled AAWSAP/AATIP program and a private sector organization’s paranormal research efforts. These individuals have worked with each other consistently in various UAP-related efforts. [0] https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/03/07/how-believers-paranormal-birthed-pentagons-new-hunt-ufos.html https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/03/07/how-believers... [1] https://nypost.com/2023/03/21/ufo-believing-pentagon-bosses-missed-spy-craft-for-years/ https://nypost.com/2023/03/21/ufo-believing-pentagon-bosses-...

zikzak 3y ago
Probably referring to Bigelow Aerospace https://www.bigelowaerospace.com/pages/news/ https://www.bigelowaerospace.com/pages/news/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bigelow https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bigelow Does the report claim all sightings can be definitely explained? The very small percentage that cannot is where efforts should be focused. Anomalies like to that could lead to really interesting discoveries. Maybe there's a lot we don't know about how plasma forms and behaves, for example. I find this area really interesting as a pop culture phenomenon. Even Carl Jung weighed in on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosocial_UFO_hypothesis https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosocial_UFO_hypothesis
- crispyambulance 3y ago
  > Does the report claim all sightings can be definitely explained? The very small percentage that cannot is where efforts should be focused. The military, at least, is very interested in being able to identify anything picked up by their sensors. But it's hard for them to publicly acknowledge this stuff because then it means they need to talk about the exact nature of the classified systems which they used to detect whatever the unknown phenomena was.

by krapp 3y ago

zikzak 3y ago

Probably referring to Bigelow Aerospace https://www.bigelowaerospace.com/pages/news/ https://www.bigelowaerospace.com/pages/news/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bigelow https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bigelow Does the report claim all sightings can be definitely explained? The very small percentage that cannot is where efforts should be focused. Anomalies like to that could lead to really interesting discoveries. Maybe there's a lot we don't know about how plasma forms and behaves, for example. I find this area really interesting as a pop culture phenomenon. Even Carl Jung weighed in on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosocial_UFO_hypothesis https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychosocial_UFO_hypothesis

crispyambulance 3y ago
> Does the report claim all sightings can be definitely explained? The very small percentage that cannot is where efforts should be focused. The military, at least, is very interested in being able to identify anything picked up by their sensors. But it's hard for them to publicly acknowledge this stuff because then it means they need to talk about the exact nature of the classified systems which they used to detect whatever the unknown phenomena was.