3 ms·
As brilliant as Antirez is, he can't get his own valid SSL cert? :)
by klinquist 3y ago
As brilliant as Antirez is, he can't get his own valid SSL cert? :)
- westhanover 3y agoOr he is brilliant enough to know you don’t need one on your blog. I really don’t care if someone messes with your traffic to my blog!
- tambourine_man 3y agoAgreed on principle, but the “not secure” warning in the url bar is an annoyance I cannot stand.
- OJFord 3y agoWell the full-page insecure advanced continue with http is even worse. I (we) understand there's no real reason to need it, but if you're serving the general public (as isn't the case here) you absolutely need TLS whatever you're doing in 2024 IMO. Personally if I were blogging even for this audience I'd want to avoid that friction, but I think it's not like antirez doesn't know about it, I assumed it's a sort of protest.
- o11c 3y agoNot using HTTPS means that anybody can inject malware for visitors to your website. There are no websites that don't need SSL.
- eru 3y agoThough browsers should really protect you against that already. ('Should', not 'would'.) Because SSL doesn't mean that there won't be malware on the site injected via some other means, ie by someone hijacking the server or by an otherwise malicious server.
- tambourine_man 3y agoOr a better way to navigate the gazillion posts in his site. There are no categories, not even a way to list all posts by title only that I could find.