3 ms·
> On the other hand, given a non-permanent partition and the requirements that a request receives a response eventually, that is, in unbounded time, both strong
by stevefan1999 3y ago
> On the other hand, given a non-permanent partition and the requirements that a request receives a response eventually, that is, in unbounded time, both strong consistency as well as weak consistency can be achieved.
Is that why S3 works so well?
- rubiquity 3y agoThe point they're trying to make is that the A in CAP is ambiguous. If your timeout is unbounded and a request completes an hour/day/month/year or more later is the system available?