3 ms·

Limiting characters can also be a feature, so users can't use emojis in their password (this is so fun), to realize later they can't login, because they don't k

Limiting characters can also be a feature, so users can't use emojis in their password (this is so fun), to realize later they can't login, because they don't know how to input emojis from their desktop computer. Hopefully passwords will be gone soon (at least that's my hope).

Sammi 3y ago
There's only so much user hand holding you can do.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- docmars 3y ago
  With how ubiquitous Apple is, introducing a small limitation to prevent user error can make a huge difference in reducing support requests.
  - willcipriano 3y ago
    I'd give them the emoji keyboard on the login page. Make a web version they can use. The wider the possible keyspace the better.
  - amarant 3y ago
    We all know how great a company Apple is(sigh), but even they make mistakes. Stop defending stupidity just because it's Apple being stupid this time.
    - docmars 3y ago
      Don't get me wrong, it's a stupid limitation indeed -- but sometimes decisions like these are meant to stop users from doing stupider things :) I'm no fan of oversimplification, but Apple's audience is everyone, not just power users. In that case, I'd prefer having advanced options surfaced to me as "advanced" so I can do what I want, but leave the simple experiences for the simple folk.
amarant 3y ago
You might have half a point about emojis, but that's not what Apple is doing here. Is there a reason I as a Swede should be limited from using my full native alphabet in my passwords for example? As an example, you know how people sometimes suggest using a short sentence as a password? Here's a phrase in a local dialect, which means "and in the river there's an island" Å i åa e ä ö Notice how only 2 of those letters are available in ASCII. ASCII only is not a feature, and I honestly doubt anyone would try to argue that it is if this was about any company other than Apple. Try to look past the "who" and focus on the "what".

Sammi 3y ago

There's only so much user hand holding you can do.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
docmars 3y ago
With how ubiquitous Apple is, introducing a small limitation to prevent user error can make a huge difference in reducing support requests.
- willcipriano 3y ago
  I'd give them the emoji keyboard on the login page. Make a web version they can use. The wider the possible keyspace the better.
- amarant 3y ago
  We all know how great a company Apple is(sigh), but even they make mistakes. Stop defending stupidity just because it's Apple being stupid this time.
  - docmars 3y ago
    Don't get me wrong, it's a stupid limitation indeed -- but sometimes decisions like these are meant to stop users from doing stupider things :) I'm no fan of oversimplification, but Apple's audience is everyone, not just power users. In that case, I'd prefer having advanced options surfaced to me as "advanced" so I can do what I want, but leave the simple experiences for the simple folk.

amarant 3y ago

You might have half a point about emojis, but that's not what Apple is doing here. Is there a reason I as a Swede should be limited from using my full native alphabet in my passwords for example? As an example, you know how people sometimes suggest using a short sentence as a password? Here's a phrase in a local dialect, which means "and in the river there's an island" Å i åa e ä ö Notice how only 2 of those letters are available in ASCII. ASCII only is not a feature, and I honestly doubt anyone would try to argue that it is if this was about any company other than Apple. Try to look past the "who" and focus on the "what".