2 ms·
Can't give upvotes, but +1 for this insightful framing. The "Police and thieves in the street" problem as I call it, is that in most discussions we hear about
by nonrandomstring 3y ago
Can't give upvotes, but +1 for this insightful framing.
The "Police and thieves in the street" problem as I call it, is that
in most discussions we hear about the two big noisy players duking it
out for control.
In reality it's a three way struggle. By far the largest and most
powerful group is often completely silent and omitted from the
analysis.
"Consumers" or "Voters" (although I would prefer the term "people")
are subsumed into the other camps, each claiming to "represent" the
people.
Yet the silent, overwhelming majority are starting to reclaim a voice
of their own. This is a worrying sign. Not because people shouldn't
have a voice, but because it shows clearly that at best, governments
and commercial markets are failing to represent the actual interests
of people. Perhaps we've become complacent allowing plurality of power
structures, unions, assemblies, societies etc to weaken?
- bryanrasmussen 3y ago>"Consumers" or "Voters" (although I would prefer the term "people") are subsumed into the other camps, each claiming to "represent" the people. Citizens?
- nonrandomstring 3y agoYes "citizens" is good - hence "civic cybersecurity" as a placeholder for what I believe in [0]. But many countries do not officially recognise "citizenship". For example, in Britain (UK) we remain "subjects" although "citizen" is used in official documents. Maybe splitting hairs; but I don't want to assume that everyone in the world enjoys such a privileged status. [0] http://www.icicte.org/assets/icicte2019_5.4_farnell.pdf http://www.icicte.org/assets/icicte2019_5.4_farnell.pdf