3 ms·
This is a good start, but they'll need to lay a pretty hefty fine on Apple if they want a result different from another malicious compliance shell game. As long
by reissbaker 3y ago
This is a good start, but they'll need to lay a pretty hefty fine on Apple if they want a result different from another malicious compliance shell game. As long as it's profitable for Apple to continue doing this kind of stuff, Apple's shown they'll keep doing it.
- andersa 3y agoIn this case, the DMA theoretically allows a $38 billion fine for every year in which Apple shows any non-compliance (10% of global revenue, assuming it does not change from 2023 numbers) Given this legislation was specifically created to tackle the Apple problem, and Apple is clearly intentionally failing to comply, they may want to make an example out of them and go straight for the maximum.
- map222 3y agoIt can even go up to 20% for repeated infringement: https://www.eu-digital-markets-act.com/#:~:text=The%20Commission%20will%20monitor%20the,in%20case%20of%20repeated%20infringement https://www.eu-digital-markets-act.com/#:~:text=The%20Commis....