4 ms·
The title of that podcast isn't something I actually said (IIRC). I commented in that interview that I feel we should not consider pre-training and fine-tuning
by jph00 3y ago
The title of that podcast isn't something I actually said (IIRC). I commented in that interview that I feel we should not consider pre-training and fine-tuning to be as separate as we do now.
- Tomte 3y agoSo you‘re generally in favor of mixing training data without separating them in phases, but when I use pretrained weights (as you recommend instead of random weights) I generally do not have access to whatever the neural net was pretrained with by someone else, so I have to make do with my finetuning data, yes? Thank you!
- pama 3y agoYes.
- swyx 3y ago"The right way to fine-tune language models... is to actually throw away the idea of fine-tuning. There's no such thing. There's only continued pre-training." :) i hope i didnt pervert your intent too too much for clickbait or something, i thought it was the spirit of what you said