3 ms·
The analogy is only valid for NVDA. The real wealth with GPT goes to its millions of users - for $20 per month you can get the productivity of 10+ highly educat
by dzink 3y ago
The analogy is only valid for NVDA. The real wealth with GPT goes to its millions of users - for $20 per month you can get the productivity of 10+ highly educated people in the hands of each user, available day and night. Those users can very realistically do what entire companies did and ship software or anything else in record time as solo creators. That boundless human invention, limited only by your imagination and levels of energy.
- ensocode 3y agoVery positive view on the topic. Appreciated. We should try to force that perspective more!
- moffkalast 3y agoThose 10+ highly educated people can sign an NDA though, meanwhile OpenAI definitely logs everything anyone inputs into ChatGPT and will inevitably accidentally leak some of it one day. The principle is sound, but local models are really the only option when working on data you don't want to make public.
- dzink 3y agoThere is an interesting dividing line between prompts people care if they are leaked and prompts they don’t. It subdivides into A: “prompts I don’t want anyone to know I asked”, B: “prompts that would leak IP if leaked”, C: “I need to ask in places with no internet” and maybe other categories. Something tells me the the open models will split between catering to users that do A or B or C. The rest will be majorly going to the best subscription models.