4 ms·
Please think before you judge. The company behind FMD has single handedly sponsored the largest body of empirical evidence in support of dietary interventions
by xk_id 3y ago
Please think before you judge. The company behind FMD has single handedly sponsored the largest body of empirical evidence in support of dietary interventions for ameliorating markers of ageing. They did so because they own the patent for their diet formulation. High quality human trials in this area wouldn’t have happened otherwise, because they are extremely expensive to run. We see this problem with other promising interventions that involve for example chemicals whose patent has expired: despite the imperative scientific need, nobody can afford to pay for the human trials.
Besides, the characteristics of the diet formulation are known and can be easily reproduced at home. Overall, this company has made valuable contributions.
In the last 50 years, the whole research industry has been forced by corporate-style management techniques, the financial environment and regulatory controls to become a servant to capitalism. So given the circumstances, this is the best possible outcome.
- riehwvfbk 3y agoAnd they would have published the results of these trials even if they didn't support the company's business model, I'm sure. And they certainly wouldn't cherry-pick results. In other words, this science is almost certainly bunk.
- gumby 3y agoNegative results very very rarely get published in academia either. They sure don't help you get tenure.
- bboygravity 3y agoI guess that makes OK that nature just MSM'ed itself (reference to mainstream media slowly dying as they're now doing anything for clicks and sponsors).