3 ms·
> and the official threats of using nuclear weapons "Why are we shocked? Of course if a country has a weapon it also conceives a situation where it would use i
by guappa 3y ago
> and the official threats of using nuclear weapons
"Why are we shocked? Of course if a country has a weapon it also conceives a situation where it would use it. If a country would never under no circumstance use a weapon it would not have the weapon at all. Every country who has a weapon also conceives a scenario when to use it. Even if they don't issue reminders"
-- My own translation from an interview to Alessandro Barbero
- catlikesshrimp 3y agoTo decomission a weapon is to weaken the army. Rulers must be very careful about taking power from the army, as army officials are wary of being stripped of power. A ruler must be in the good grace of the army. For that reason, it is difficult to get rid of inherited weapons. A plausible justification is required. With Putin, however, Russia is strenghtening an army. It is correct in this case, I think, to verbally remind your enemies of the threat they represent. E.g.Trump, in the US, has a strong discourse position to pull the US from conflict, because his supporters want "To make America great again", the world be damned.
- guappa 3y agoI'm not aware of russia doing nuclear rearmament. Do you have any source in that sense?