3 ms·
It's amusing that every alternative comment is the guy expressly saying he's talking about nationality held and who they hold allegiance to, and every response
by renewiltord 3y ago
It's amusing that every alternative comment is the guy expressly saying he's talking about nationality held and who they hold allegiance to, and every response is a misunderstanding.
This is normal stuff. You can even lose your US dual citizenship if you serve in another nation's armed forces.
I actually pasted the sequence into ChatGPT and it seems to comprehend him easier than people responding to him. It is always interesting when the Turing test is failed because the bot is too smart and capable of comprehension.
- hughesjj 3y agoIf your metric for comprehension is 'agree with op's viewpoint' then it shouldn't be surprising that chatgpt 'comprehends' op better. Y'all are splitting hairs trying to call it 'nationality' vs birth. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_nationality_law https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_nationality_law Like many countries, China has a policy of jus soli. Most countries will not allow you to renounce citizenship should it leave you stateless. So, until you get another citizenship, which is typically a multi year to decades long process, you don't really have a say as to what your 'nationality' is. It's not like an infant can reasonably consent to be given citizenship, or that they would even have the option if they could. The OPs metric for allegiance is nationality, which itself is determined by where you were born rather than any actual beliefs or practices. It's disingenuous at best.