> This cannot be known until it is litigated. Fair Use is not something you can unilaterally declare and have it be so. Correct, but what isn't clear here is t

> This cannot be known until it is litigated. Fair Use is not something you can unilaterally declare and have it be so. Correct, but what isn't clear here is their rationale for why they think they're covered by fair use. Does anybody have that information? I'm not saying their interpretation is correct, but seems to be germane to this discussion. The parent comment seems to assume none of this has been litigated yet, which might also be true. Or not.