3 ms·
One thing I won't ever understand is why we allow large airports to be located in a way that puts any kind of infrastructure, be it residential, commercial, tra
by mschuster91 3y ago
One thing I won't ever understand is why we allow large airports to be located in a way that puts any kind of infrastructure, be it residential, commercial, transportation or recreational, under the flight path for critical phases (i.e. start/land). Right where I used to work there's a memorial placard for a plane that crashed in 1960 due to an engine failure [1], and maybe five minutes worth of walking from where I grew up is another memorial for a plane that failed to start, crashed into a house and led to the deaths of, among others, a significant number of players of the ManU squad [2].
There have been so many incidents and near-incidents that it should be a no-brainer, but eh, guess it's more important to have airports closer to (or even worse, inside) cities. Yes, yes, I know, airplane travel is one of the safest modes of transportation there is, but still, a dominant majority of accidents in commercial aviation happens during landing and takeoff [3]. GA is a bit different because it seems that a lot of GA pilots fuck up maneuvering [4], but still, takeoff and landing account for about half the incidents.
[1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flugzeugungl%C3%BCck_am_17._Dezember_1960_in_M%C3%BCnchen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flugzeugungl%C3%BCck_am_17._De...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_air_disaster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_air_disaster
[3] https://www.statista.com/chart/31529/most-airplane-accidents-happen-during-landing/ https://www.statista.com/chart/31529/most-airplane-accidents...
[4] https://www.redbirdflight.com/landing/general-aviation-accidents-maneuvering-flight https://www.redbirdflight.com/landing/general-aviation-accid...
- mcv 3y agoPeople generally want to travel from areas with lots of people, to other areas with lots of people. So cities. There has actually been a proposal to move Schiphol (Amsterdam Airport) to an artificial island in the North Sea, because Schiphol is producing a lot of noise pollution for the surrounding towns. (And not just that; my sister used to play hockey on fields under an approach, and sometimes the field would smell like kerosine.) But such a move would dramatically increase travel time to and from the city. Although maybe you could save time by having a dedicated train line and do checkin before getting in the train, passport check while on the train, etc.
- heironimus 3y agoIf I live within two miles of an airport, directly on the flight path, what are the odds of my house being damaged by a plane versus burning down by other causes, damaged by a falling tree, struck by lightning, etc. I don’t know, but am certain it’s negligible comparatively.
- psunavy03 3y agoThey did generally put airports out in the middle of the sticks . . . and then stuff grew up around them.
- imbnwa 3y agoTaking off from O’Hare airport in Chicago typically requires ascending over miles of residential neighborhoods
- kortilla 3y agoThere is more risk allowing homes to be built on streets where cars go.
- callalex 3y agoYou’re confused about why transit hubs, whose purpose is to move people, are built where the people are?