4 ms·
It bothers me that we can’t use LLMs for research of all types. In the same way I can use a library or google, I’d like to be able to research how to make a bo
by ada1981 3y ago
It bothers me that we can’t use LLMs for research of all types.
In the same way I can use a library or google, I’d like to be able to research how to make a bomb, drugs, etc.
Where is the Anarchist Cookbook LLM?
I’m not sure why the default idea is we need to limit the scope of information made available to people.
- fragmede 3y agollama2-uncensored as well as the Twitter LLM, grok (not groq lol) give an high level answer the question of how to make cocaine which gpt-4 flat out refuses. the amount of overhead it takes to censor these models is an argument to just uncensoring on the waste of energy alone.
- smoldesu 3y agoI don't actually think there's any overhead necessarily involved, at least if you intend to fine-tune your model (which most LLMs do anyways). Getting a model to reject offensive input is probably just as easy as defining your failure-cases and finetuning it to say nothing.
- fragmede 3y agoNot necessarily, no, but the system takes the short prompt of "draw me a picture of a Nazi" which then gets fed to another model to add add flavor text, and then is fed to another model which decides to add that the Nazi should be black, in Gemini's case, before it gets fed to the image generator. That last step, to add that the Nazi should be black is overhead and waste.