4 ms·
I do not know how damages are calculated in the US tort system. What do they say about the books3 dataset? I also think that the case is different here, since
by johndough 3y ago
I do not know how damages are calculated in the US tort system. What do they say about the books3 dataset?
I also think that the case is different here, since in your example, there is a specific amount of money being stolen, while in the books3 case, there is an unspecified amount of money not being made by the authors.
- SEGyges 3y agoI am pretty sure if the authors were trying to license their works for this purpose we would just not use them at all; it is difficult to see under what circumstances they would stand to profit from this other than by suing people after the fact over it.
- doug_durham 3y agoI think you could argue that authors could profit from their works being cited in an LLM response. It could drive sales of their works much like citations do on the web. The counter argument is that and LLM could give you the Clif Notes version of the work and thus taking away a portion of sales.
- SEGyges 3y agoIn a world where the options were to 1) pay the author, 2) implement guaranteed citation of the author any time the model gave an answer that was directly derivative, with an option to not do so if the summary was sufficiently vague, or 3) ignore the author's book completely as training data we would all choose 3).
- __loam 3y agoAnd the authors would probably be very happy that you did.