In 10+ years of corporate transactional experience as an attorney I used [Intentionally left blank] daily. About as often when an enumerated provision was stru

In 10+ years of corporate transactional experience as an attorney I used [Intentionally left blank] daily. About as often when an enumerated provision was struck from a legal agreement [Intentionally omitted] was added to the provision in lieu of striking provision in its entirety. The idea is to maintain continuity of the agreement as other provisions might cross-reference one another. Pro tip: if you strike an entire provision from an agreement, then you might want to review the entire agreement to any cross-references maintain their continuity. And if your attorney doesn’t use [Intentionally omitted], then you probably got billed for the attorney to re-review and modify the entire agreement, in which case you might want take a closer look at your attorney’s billables.