4 ms·
When, not if, and that's a good thing. I don't share your alarmist view. I think the other members of NATO will just start doing their fair share, as they shoul
by stronglikedan 3y ago
When, not if, and that's a good thing. I don't share your alarmist view. I think the other members of NATO will just start doing their fair share, as they should.
- apercu 3y agoI imagine that the actual truth to the situation is far more complicated than either of us understand and that NATO provides substantial benefits to the United States.
- KingOfCoders 3y agoNATO membership enables the US to have air bases in the UK and Turkey, Navy bases in Spain and Italy, and in other parts of Europe with overflight rights for military planes. Most of the air traffic for the US wars in the middle east goes through Germany, and most injured soldiers go back through Germany [0] Many US soldiers survive because they get through Landstuhl. Ramstein is also rumored to be the primary operation center for drone strikes, although the US military denies this. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landstuhl_Regional_Medical_Center https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landstuhl_Regional_Medical_Cen...
- unmole 3y ago> NATO membership enables the US to have air bases in the UK and Turkey The US has military bases in Qatar, Seychelles, and the Philippines. It's almost as if NATO membership has nothing to do with it.
- tharmas 3y ago[flagged]
- earthnail 3y agoThe consequences of living in a multilateral world will be very bad for the US. Right now, the US is the leader in a unilateral world. It is absolutely naive to think that this doesn’t come with huge advantages.
- lawn 3y agoSo you'd prefer countless of people getting raped and murdered... To make the point that other countries aren't also spending ludicrous amounts of money on the military? The lack of morals is stunning.