Yes they did? Violating some company's ToS is completely irrelevant when it comes to actual laws. And more importantly, it makes no sense that Epic has to int

Yes they did? Violating some company's ToS is completely irrelevant when it comes to actual laws. And more importantly, it makes no sense that Epic has to interact with Apple at all in order to sell software to owners of Apple products. Apple has implemented systems which makes this very hard or impossible for non-expert users. Which means Apple violates basic principles of ownership.