4 ms·
As I said, why not 10:1 (a commonly repeated, equally unsupported ratio) 50:1 or 100:1? So no, the 25:1 number came from being in the unique position to spout p
by warmfuzzykitten 14y ago
As I said, why not 10:1 (a commonly repeated, equally unsupported ratio) 50:1 or 100:1? So no, the 25:1 number came from being in the unique position to spout precise-sounding, unsubstantiated numbers in an environment where nobody would argue with him. What did occur to me is there are no significant digits in that number.
- robocat 14y agoBeing pedantic, but I definitely have seen developers with zero productivity: so everyone else productive is infinitely better... Excepting, there are also programmers and teams with negative productivity - work out the ratio!