Even with these chemicals being as difficult as they are to verifiably remove, I can only imagine it'll be easier to figure out the path forward excluding these

Even with these chemicals being as difficult as they are to verifiably remove, I can only imagine it'll be easier to figure out the path forward excluding these from human contact on a reasonable timeline compared to augmenting or modifying human systems to resilience against PFAS contact. E.g., check out the EPA list [1] on known human effects. Our bodies really, really don't like these chemicals. "Reproductive effects such as decreased fertility or increased high blood pressure in pregnant women; Developmental effects or delays in children, including low birth weight, accelerated puberty, bone variations, or behavioral changes; Increased risk of some cancers, including prostate, kidney, and testicular cancers; Reduced ability of the body’s immune system to fight infections, including reduced vaccine response; Interference with the body’s natural hormones; Increased cholesterol levels and/or risk of obesity;" [1] https://www.epa.gov/pfas/our-current-understanding-human-health-and-environmental-risks-pfas https://www.epa.gov/pfas/our-current-understanding-human-hea...