3 ms·
That side process is like nothing I have ever seen: Such things can, and at every reasonable place I know are, tracked as non-conformities on the corresponding
by hef19898 3y ago
That side process is like nothing I have ever seen: Such things can, and at every reasonable place I know are, tracked as non-conformities on the corresponding work order and reviewed and approved by quality. If no work instructions exist yet, a singlenuse on is created, checked and approved before the work is done. For having the idea in the first place of allowing some side discussions on whethe or not documentation is necessary should have someone get his ass kicked. And it should be a major audit finding, which it seems it is for the FAA.
Boeing is in trouble, I'd say.
- pyrale 3y ago> That side process is like nothing I have ever seen There's been a story about Googlers avoiding chat history as much as possible when discussing topics that could cause trouble with discovery, and actively destroyed evidence or attempted to after they had inadvertently left history on. https://ia601707.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.cand.364454/gov.uscourts.cand.364454.385.0.pdf https://ia601707.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.cand.3...
- bigbillheck 3y ago> Googlers avoiding chat history Oh, so that's why they keep churning thru chat apps.
- dzdt 3y agoYeah I would have thought there would be a clear line -- something like "if you are touching the airplane with a tool there needs to be an official record associated" -- and no room for further discussion around it.
- hef19898 3y agoIm very broad terms, that's the way of doing things I know.